스크립트 (en)

Well, sure. To answer your first question, I don't know Mr. Pressler, but if he had a ticket, they should have allowed him in. Duh. Number two, as to the SAVE Act, I think we ought to pass it. The SAVE Act, to me, I'm a co-sponsor. It means two things. It means that to vote in America, you have to prove you are who you say you are to be able to vote. You have to have an ID at the polls, and you have to be an American citizen. And number two, it means that we ought to go back to having an election day, not an election month. We need to know who the winner is on election night. I would continue to try to pass the SAVE Act. We tried, I think, four times. I offered it as an amendment in our last reconciliation voterama I only got 47 votes I have encouraged Senator Thune to put the SAVE Act on the FISA bill, which is a must-pass bill. Hope he does that when we get back. I'm fully supportive of what Mike wants to do. We've tried it once, but I'm willing to try it again, and that is Mike wants to put the bill on the floor, and then we all talk about it. And supposedly at some point the Democrats will give in. You can be your own judge of whether that'll happen or not. Final point, I guess, Senator Mike Johnson, my friend who's Speaker of the House, just announced he wants to try it again through reconciliation. I support that. I think it's possible if we get some really big legal brains to draft it so that all or a substantial portion of it could pass the Byrd test.