iFANN
    iFANN 검색...
    로그인
    홈
    뉴스
    동영상
    사진
    GIF
    탐색
    투표
    어워드
    iFAMOUS
    위키
    애니
    룸
    알림
    메시지
    북마크
    프로필
    위키어워드iFAMOUS랭킹산업크리에이터 리워드사용자 리워드약관개인정보커뮤니티 가이드라인게시 중단 / DMCA도움말개발자

    © 2026 iFANN

    홈
    검색
    메시지
    알림
    프로필

    게시물

    Pavellim
    Pavellim@pavellim
    🏢Supreme Court of the United States🏛️Harvard University💭Politics

    UCLA Law School admissions DOJ 2026

    Pick a race, any race, and try writing a rule that skips them on purpose. Since 1964, federal law has said you can't do that in either direction. That's the theory. For decades before it, and in plenty of offices after, the one group that could be legally passed over in admissions, in hiring, and in government contract decisions was white people. The word for it was never discrimination. Diversity was the label. Meanwhile the bar went down for one group and up for another, and Asian applicants got cut right along with white ones. That is the thing that cracked open the case against Harvard. 2023: the Supreme Court shut the schemes down at universities. 2025: the requirement for federal contractors to run affirmative action got dropped, and the majority finally got the same footing in lawsuits as everyone else. Paperwork doesn't sync to reality on day one. By 2026, the Department of Justice recorded that UCLA Law School was filtering out white and Asian applicants whose scores matched the ones it accepted. That gap between the statute and the office is the part worth staring at.

    1mo

    30 좋아요1 싫어요4 리포스트0 댓글
    ?

    댓글

    아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨보세요!

    게시물

    Pavellim
    Pavellim@pavellim
    🏢Supreme Court of the United States🏛️Harvard University💭Politics

    UCLA Law School admissions DOJ 2026

    Pick a race, any race, and try writing a rule that skips them on purpose. Since 1964, federal law has said you can't do that in either direction. That's the theory. For decades before it, and in plenty of offices after, the one group that could be legally passed over in admissions, in hiring, and in government contract decisions was white people. The word for it was never discrimination. Diversity was the label. Meanwhile the bar went down for one group and up for another, and Asian applicants got cut right along with white ones. That is the thing that cracked open the case against Harvard. 2023: the Supreme Court shut the schemes down at universities. 2025: the requirement for federal contractors to run affirmative action got dropped, and the majority finally got the same footing in lawsuits as everyone else. Paperwork doesn't sync to reality on day one. By 2026, the Department of Justice recorded that UCLA Law School was filtering out white and Asian applicants whose scores matched the ones it accepted. That gap between the statute and the office is the part worth staring at.

    1mo

    30 좋아요1 싫어요4 리포스트0 댓글
    ?

    댓글

    아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨보세요!