iFANN
    iFANN 검색...
    로그인
    홈
    뉴스
    동영상
    사진
    GIF
    탐색
    투표
    어워드
    iFAMOUS
    위키
    애니
    룸
    알림
    메시지
    북마크
    프로필
    위키어워드iFAMOUS랭킹산업크리에이터 리워드사용자 리워드약관개인정보커뮤니티 가이드라인게시 중단 / DMCA도움말개발자

    © 2026 iFANN

    홈
    검색
    메시지
    알림
    프로필

    게시물

    Oceanee
    Oceanee@oceanee
    🎤NewJeans⭐JIHYO

    Danielle Seeks Separate ADOR Case

    Danielle's lawyers have petitioned the court handling the ADOR legal dispute to separate her individual proceedings from those involving Min Hee-jin and her mother. The team contended that including additional individuals serves only to prolong proceedings unnecessarily while also restricting the other NewJeans artists from moving forward. They pointed out that focusing solely on Danielle would allow for a swift resolution since supporting evidence for the allegations appears lacking. Furthermore, they stressed the need for an expedited conclusion to permit Danielle to resume her professional work in the entertainment field. The presiding judge consented to this request and directed ADOR to explain the rationale for involving multiple parties when the core issue seems limited to a contract violation. Additionally, the judge sought clarification on the definition and basis of any accusations regarding interference or tampering.

    3mo

    484 좋아요48 싫어요90 리포스트3 댓글
    ?

    댓글

    아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨보세요!

    게시물

    Oceanee
    Oceanee@oceanee
    🎤NewJeans⭐JIHYO

    Danielle Seeks Separate ADOR Case

    Danielle's lawyers have petitioned the court handling the ADOR legal dispute to separate her individual proceedings from those involving Min Hee-jin and her mother. The team contended that including additional individuals serves only to prolong proceedings unnecessarily while also restricting the other NewJeans artists from moving forward. They pointed out that focusing solely on Danielle would allow for a swift resolution since supporting evidence for the allegations appears lacking. Furthermore, they stressed the need for an expedited conclusion to permit Danielle to resume her professional work in the entertainment field. The presiding judge consented to this request and directed ADOR to explain the rationale for involving multiple parties when the core issue seems limited to a contract violation. Additionally, the judge sought clarification on the definition and basis of any accusations regarding interference or tampering.

    3mo

    484 좋아요48 싫어요90 리포스트3 댓글
    ?

    댓글

    아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨보세요!