iFANN
    iFANN 검색...
    로그인
    홈
    뉴스
    동영상
    사진
    GIF
    탐색
    투표
    어워드
    iFAMOUS
    위키
    애니
    룸
    알림
    메시지
    북마크
    프로필
    위키어워드iFAMOUS랭킹산업크리에이터 리워드사용자 리워드약관개인정보커뮤니티 가이드라인게시 중단 / DMCA도움말개발자

    © 2026 iFANN

    홈
    검색
    메시지
    알림
    프로필
    사진
    Estebankiwi
    Estebankiwi@estebankiwi3mo
    📱GPT💭AI💭Tech
    Claude Fable 5 DeepSWE benchmark

    @estebankiwiClaude Fable 5 has claimed the top spot on DeepSWE with a score of 70%. However, the performance gap between Fable 5 and GPT 5.5 is far more significant than just three percentage points. Fable 5 generates code that reads as if it were written by a senior engineer, while GPT 5.5 produces code that simply passes the tests. Both models deliver functional software, but only one delivers software that truly impresses.

    원본 게시물 보기

    Claude Fable 5 DeepSWE benchmark

    @estebankiwi님의 사진· Jun 19, 2026· GPT

    이 사진에 대해

    The image shows a horizontal bar chart comparing AI models. The focus is on a table with model names, performance metrics, and bars representing their performance. The model "claude-fable-5" is highlighted with a red rectangle around it and its corresponding bar is orange. The table columns are labeled "MODEL", "PASS@1", "AVG COST", "OUT TOK", and "STEPS". The model names listed are claude-fable-5, gpt-5.5, claude-opus-4.8, gpt-5.4, gemini-3.5-flash, and kimi-k2.7-code. No on-screen text stands out aside from the column headers and model names.

    GPT 사진 전체 보기GPT 위키 읽기

    ?

    GPT 사진 더 보기

    GPT 사진 전체 보기
    AI as your doctor?AI as your doctor?GPT 6 Astra effort comparison tableGPT 6 Astra effort comparison tablemanual coding psychopathmanual coding psychopathJensen Huang AGI has arrived GPT-6 Astra2Jensen Huang AGI has arrived GPT-6 AstraAI Breakfast greatest predictionAI Breakfast greatest predictionweekend plans cancelledweekend plans cancelledAI Image Models ComparisonAI Image Models Comparison
    사진
    Estebankiwi
    Estebankiwi@estebankiwi3mo
    📱GPT💭AI💭Tech
    Claude Fable 5 DeepSWE benchmark

    @estebankiwiClaude Fable 5 has claimed the top spot on DeepSWE with a score of 70%. However, the performance gap between Fable 5 and GPT 5.5 is far more significant than just three percentage points. Fable 5 generates code that reads as if it were written by a senior engineer, while GPT 5.5 produces code that simply passes the tests. Both models deliver functional software, but only one delivers software that truly impresses.

    원본 게시물 보기

    Claude Fable 5 DeepSWE benchmark

    @estebankiwi님의 사진· Jun 19, 2026· GPT

    이 사진에 대해

    The image shows a horizontal bar chart comparing AI models. The focus is on a table with model names, performance metrics, and bars representing their performance. The model "claude-fable-5" is highlighted with a red rectangle around it and its corresponding bar is orange. The table columns are labeled "MODEL", "PASS@1", "AVG COST", "OUT TOK", and "STEPS". The model names listed are claude-fable-5, gpt-5.5, claude-opus-4.8, gpt-5.4, gemini-3.5-flash, and kimi-k2.7-code. No on-screen text stands out aside from the column headers and model names.

    GPT 사진 전체 보기GPT 위키 읽기

    ?

    GPT 사진 더 보기

    GPT 사진 전체 보기
    AI as your doctor?AI as your doctor?GPT 6 Astra effort comparison tableGPT 6 Astra effort comparison tablemanual coding psychopathmanual coding psychopathJensen Huang AGI has arrived GPT-6 Astra2Jensen Huang AGI has arrived GPT-6 AstraAI Breakfast greatest predictionAI Breakfast greatest predictionweekend plans cancelledweekend plans cancelledAI Image Models ComparisonAI Image Models Comparison