@estebankiwiCursor’s proprietary Composer 2.5 model has been released, and its benchmarks are nearly indistinguishable from Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.7. On Terminal-Bench 2.0, Composer 2.5 scored 69.3% versus Opus 4.7’s 69.4%. In SWE-Bench Multilingual, the gap was similarly narrow: 79.8% for Composer against 80.5% for Opus. On CursorBench v3.1, Composer 2.5 also performed competitively. The company has essentially built a model that goes head-to-head with Anthropic’s offering.
원본 게시물 보기@estebankiwi님의 사진· May 18, 2026· Anthropic
The focus is on a comparison table featuring different software versions. It displays performance percentages for Composer 2.5, Opus 4.7, GPT-5.5, and Composer 2 across three benchmarks: Terminal-Bench 2.0, SWE-Bench Multilingual, and CursorBench v3.1. The style is data-driven and analytical, with a simple white background and black text. Notably, Composer 2.5 is highlighted with a red border, drawing attention to its performance metrics.
Anthropic engineer explains Claude Code workflow
2US government Anthropic trust
2Anthropic Fable 5.1 Mythos 5.1
2Anthropic First Amendment ruling
2Anthropic Claude lab operator
Anthropic Claude Academy launch
2Anthropic IPO Claude AI
Claude vs ChatGPT free speech debate
Isabella He Anthropic Code w/ Claude
2Anthropic IPO odds surge
Codex features and uptime chart
2Dario Amodei AI disease cure
2Dario Amodei Anthropic AI@estebankiwiCursor’s proprietary Composer 2.5 model has been released, and its benchmarks are nearly indistinguishable from Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.7. On Terminal-Bench 2.0, Composer 2.5 scored 69.3% versus Opus 4.7’s 69.4%. In SWE-Bench Multilingual, the gap was similarly narrow: 79.8% for Composer against 80.5% for Opus. On CursorBench v3.1, Composer 2.5 also performed competitively. The company has essentially built a model that goes head-to-head with Anthropic’s offering.
원본 게시물 보기@estebankiwi님의 사진· May 18, 2026· Anthropic
The focus is on a comparison table featuring different software versions. It displays performance percentages for Composer 2.5, Opus 4.7, GPT-5.5, and Composer 2 across three benchmarks: Terminal-Bench 2.0, SWE-Bench Multilingual, and CursorBench v3.1. The style is data-driven and analytical, with a simple white background and black text. Notably, Composer 2.5 is highlighted with a red border, drawing attention to its performance metrics.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨보세요!
Anthropic engineer explains Claude Code workflow2US government Anthropic trust2Anthropic Fable 5.1 Mythos 5.12Anthropic First Amendment ruling2Anthropic Claude lab operatorAnthropic Claude Academy launch2Anthropic IPO Claude AIClaude vs ChatGPT free speech debateIsabella He Anthropic Code w/ Claude2Anthropic IPO odds surgeCodex features and uptime chart2Dario Amodei AI disease cure2Dario Amodei Anthropic AI
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨보세요!